<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>OpenGLES2.0 EGL X11 — Your Destination for Single Board Computers</title>
        <link>https://forum.loverpi.com/</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2023 08:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>OpenGLES2.0 EGL X11 — Your Destination for Single Board Computers</description>
    <atom:link href="https://forum.loverpi.com/discussions/tagged/opengles2-0-egl-x11/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>GPU performance is...good but terrible, depending on what you need.</title>
        <link>https://forum.loverpi.com/discussion/888/gpu-performance-is-good-but-terrible-depending-on-what-you-need</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>AML-S805X-AC</category>
        <dc:creator>BrianBeuken</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">888@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[I've discovered something strange, after spending quite some time getting my La Frite up and running with Ubuntu mate with mali, I finally got a chance to try a few test projects. But first I wanted to test its GPU performance with GLMark2-es2 (for gles2), and I got very strange results.<br />Off screen it is actually quite nippy, returning a score of 277 which is not bad at all, better than a Raspberry 3B. But on screen peformance is shocking and returned a score of only 6, thats beyond bad, I'd expect it to be locked to the frame rate of 50 to 60fps or if not locked come close to the off-screen score.<br />I tried one of my heavy GLESv2 test projects and after installing build-essential and all relevent libs for the project it actually did really well and built and run the project.....at less than 5fps....that was surprising.<br />Does anyone know&nbsp; why the on screen video performance should be so bad when some effort went into providing Mali 450 drivers? I was using X11 to displayb the screen.]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
